![]() This is not a new line of attack from Republicans against the committee. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger to represent the GOP on the panel. However, McCarthy pulled all five members in response to Pelosi’s rejection. ![]() Jim Banks of Indiana, but accepted the other three. McCarthy initially selected five GOP members to serve on the committee. Jordan claimed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “failed to consult with Leader McCarthy about the appointment of Republican members,” thereby violating a requirement outlined in the resolution establishing the select committee.įacts First: This is misleading. Even after both sides agreed to a structure for the panel, tensions emerged around who should sit on it. Ultimately, Jordan voted to overturn the results in the two states where Republicans’ objections made it to a vote – Arizona and Pennsylvania.Īttempts to establish a bipartisan committee to investigate the January 6 attack have been plagued by partisan conflict since the start. In December 2020, Jordan attended meetings at the White House with Trump, then-Vice President Mike Pence, and a handful of other congressional Republicans to discuss how to overturn the election results. It’s worth noting that Jordan is a long-term Trump ally who objected to the certification of the November 2020 election in the House on January 6. Committee Chair Bennie Thompson requested Jordan’s cooperation on the basis that he “had at least one and possibly multiple communications with President Trump on January 6th.” A January 6 select committee spokesperson said in response to Jordan’s letter that due to these communications he does have information the committee is seeking and is a “material witness.” Jordan indicated he doesn’t plan to cooperate with the committee’s request because he has “no relevant information that would assist the Select Committee.”įacts First: Though Jordan might not believe he has relevant information, what matters is that the Select Committee does. Here are the facts around some of the statements and assertions in Jordan’s four-page letter. ![]() We put the reasons in there, we put the statements in there that we did because we felt that were important to say.” When asked on Monday, Jordan declined to say explicitly that he would not cooperate with the committee but emphasized that “The letter speaks for itself. Jim Jordan of Ohio accused the investigation of spreading misinformation “to paint a false and misleading narrative.”Īs part of its effort to examine the role former President Donald Trump and his allies played in the insurrection, the committee has already interviewed more than 300 witnesses but its interview requests to Jordan and other major allies of former President Donald Trump represent a significant step in the investigation. In a letter sent Sunday responding to a request to meet with the House select committee investigating January 6, Republican Rep.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |